Tuesday, May 27, 2008

For Those Wanting Forms: Legal Zoom Review

Many visiting here look for forms and that is not really the purpose of this blog. Instead, read What is LegalZoom? from eLawering Blog. I think the review does a good job of balancing the pros and cons of a service like LegalZoom.

The review makes a point of something I have noticed about these online sites:

The company claims that: "With LegalZoom's lawyer-free service, you can save up to 85% off the rates an attorney would charge for the same procedure. " This comparison misrepresents the contribution that an attorney makes when serving a client. It suggests that the LegalZoom service is equivalent to the services of an attorney, when it clearly isn't. The representation suggests that a consumer will receive the same result that they would get if they went to an attorney, which is clearly not the case. Moreover, there are many attorneys who charge fees which compare favorably with LegalZoom's fee structure, so the fees that lawyers charge for comparable transactions which are published on the LegalZoom web site are true of some law firms, but not all solo and small firms.
Cheap is cheap, and you need to keep that mind. A little research into what a local attorney will charge for forms and services would do you better than relying on a commercial with nationwide reach.

Monday, May 26, 2008

Employees Beware of What You Are Doing on Your Company's Computer

The Muncie Star-Press publishes another warning of employees losing jobs over what they do online at work. I think that we all would know that a company owns its own computers and employees have no privacy rights on those computers. Then I read something like Companies monitoring employees and realize that the word either is not getting out or not being heard:
"Employers have ways to monitor the e-mail you send and the Web sites you visit on your computer at work.

And some have fired workers who have surfed inappropriate Web sites or written harassing or offensive e-mails.

'In summary, employees really have no expectation of privacy at all in the workplace,' said Manny Avramidis, senior vice president of global human resources for the American Management Association. 'In many ways, their privacy is checked at the door.'

More than half of employers fire workers for e-mail and Internet abuse, according to the AMA's 2007 Electronic Monitoring & Surveillance Survey. In the survey, 66 percent said they monitored Internet connections and 65 percent block Web sites at work, up from 27 percent in 2001.

Companies are concerned about workers spending too much time on the Web, decreasin"

Saturday, May 24, 2008

Justice Scalia on Persuading Judges

The American Bar Association Magazine excerpted parts of Justice Scalia's book on legal writing and argument in Making Your Case. I disagree with most of Scalia's jurisprudence but his advice about writing is spot on:

Value clarity above all other elements of style In brief-writing, one feature of a good style trumps all others. Literary elegance, erudition, sophistication of expression—these and all other qualities must be sac­rificed if they detract from clarity. This means, for example, that the same word should be used to refer to a particular key concept, even if elegance of style would avoid such repetition in favor of various synonyms. It means that you must abandon interesting and erudite asides if they sidetrack the drive toward the point you are making. It means that you should never use a word that the judge may have to look up

Friday, May 23, 2008

Starting a Business: Where to Incorporate

I say where you live is best. The students of the University of Illinois College of Law agree.

They published Home Is Where the Most Economically Beneficial Laws Are: Finding the Best Location to Incorporate Your Business on their blog, The Illinois Business Journal.

For the majority of small businesses, incorporation in one's home state is often the easiest and least expensive option. This is because most states have laws that require entrepreneurs to re-register a Delaware company in the state where it is actually doing business, and unfortunately, re-registration involves more than a few hours of paper work. Not only will the new business be subject to all the same taxes and fees as an in-state company, but there is also the added expense of registering as a "foreign corporation" in the home state and any annual fees in both states. (Footnotes omitted)
On Craig's List, I see companies offering to incorporate Indiana businesses in Delaware. If you are thinking of hiring one of these companies, contact an Indiana attorney for advice. There are many who will be able to advise you throughout the state. I am available throughout Indiana for anyone wanting to incorporate a business.

A slightly different estate planning: Pets

I suggest anyone interested in the topic take a look at Danny Meeks' Pet Trust Law Blog. To the best of my knowledge, this is the first blog on this topic.

Employment Law and Public Employees

Constitutional issues appear more easily with government employees than with private employees. Constitutional rights apply against the government and rarely against private employers. Still, there are limits to constitutional protections for government employees. The Indiana Lawyer reports on a recent case from the federal Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals:

In Gregory G. Samuelson v. LaPorte Community School Board, et al., No. 06-4351, Gregory Samuelson filed an action under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 against his employer LaPorte Community School Corporation (LSC), alleging violations of the First and 14th Amendments, and the Indiana Constitution, following his removal by the school board as coach of the girls' varsity basketball team.

***

The 7th Circuit affirmed the ruling, finding Samuelson's First Amendment rights were not violated because the school corporation's chain-of-command policy doesn't constitute prior restraint because it doesn't restrict speech protected by the First Amendment. The speech addressed in the policy is speech grounded in the public employee's professional duties and is not protected, wrote Chief Judge Frank Easterbrook.

Samuelson couldn't present concrete evidence to show his contract as basketball coach wasn't renewed as a result of his circumventing the chain-of-command policy on various school-related issues, so summary judgment on his claim in favor of LSC was correct, wrote Chief Judge Easterbrook.

Thursday, May 22, 2008

Collections: Fraudulent Transfers, New Case from the Indiana Court of Appeals

The Indiana Court of Appeals held in Hoesman v. Sheffler (pdf) format that a debtor is not a necessary party to a fraudulent transfer suit (pages 8 -9). Hoesman involves a trustee converting money in a trust. Those thinking of a trust with a relative should read this case. Cases like Hoesman are why I recommend an institution instead of an individual as trustee.

The Court of Appeals also discusses the issue of getting value for an alleged fraudulent transfer (pages 10- 12) and the "badges of fraud" (pages 12 - 15). Reading the discussion at page 10 -12 about good faith purchasers, I am of the opinion that this case will bear directly on Indiana's assignment for benefit of creditors statute.

The opinion also discusses IC 30-4-3-22(c) and the priority of liens.

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

Online Resources - Public Citizen and FOIA cases

Public Citizen provides information on the following Freedom of Information topics (yes, it is a portal page):

  1. Drafting FOIA Requests
  2. Legal Research & Litigation Resources
  3. Speeches, Reports, Comments and Articles

Business Law: The Contract from Hell

What makes a badly written contract? Business owners who think the better contract brims with legalese needs to read How To Earn Undying Loyalty From Business Clients (Part 1) - Guest Blogger Anita Campbell.

I came through law school after the start of the Plain English movement had begun but I think even without that education my natural impatience would have gravitated towards plain English in legal writing. Think about it. A contract acts as a blueprint for a contract. What happens if the people to that contract cannot understand what they are supposed to do under the contract?

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Employment Law: Avoid Problems When Hiring

Worforce.com has a rather long but worth reading piece under the headline, The Hiring Process: A Primer of Legal Do's and Don'ts. Bookmark it, print it out, but reading it is worth the time.

Business Groups Bash Pivotal 401(k) Suit Filed Against Deere | workforce.com

Off the beaten path for me and this blog but Business Groups Bash Pivotal 401(k) Suit Filed Against Deere from workforce. com has some interesting news on 401(k) plans :

"The ERISA Industry Committee, the American Benefits Council and the National Association of Manufacturers have filed a joint brief stating that the lawsuit should be dismissed in appeals court, where the case currently resides."

“This case is ripe,” said Quentin Riegel, the vice president for litigation and deputy general counsel for the National Association of Manufacturers, the trade association that represents more than 11,000 companies in the U.S. “It’s on appeal, so we feel that the time is right to voice our view and reaffirm that this case should be dismissed.”

Last summer, a federal judge granted Deere’s motion to dismiss the case, in which Deere workers alleged that fees in the company’s 401(k) plan were excessive. The suit also named investment manager Fidelity as a defendant, and alleged that both parties breached their fiduciary obligations by providing mutual funds and 401(k) services to participants with unreasonable, and undisclosed, costs attached.

Consumer: Eco-Funerals

When I saw the title Eco-Funerals - Green to the Grave at the Toronto Estate Law Blog, I knew I had to read it. I heard of these on NPR several years back but I did not recall any mention of Canada, only of England and Arizona (if I recall correctly). What are they? This is a good description.

So what exactly makes a funeral eco-friendly? Green funerals do not embalm bodies with chemical preservatives, but rather dress them in clothes made from natural fibers and place them in cardboard coffins. Although they are more challenging to handle (especially when they are wet), they biodegrade within 3 months. Trees or shrubs are often used to mark individual plots, rather than marble tombstones, as marble is not a renewable resource. Irrigation and pesticides are not used.
If you do read the original post, remember that the Indiana cemetery may not be able to accommodate this sort of burial.

Monday, May 19, 2008

Justices split on rental restriction case

The Indiana Daily Lawyer reports The Indiana Supreme Court came down on the side of a homeowner/landlord against a homeowners association. The following is from Justices split on rental restriction case:

"The state's highest court has been quiet on the issue since hearing arguments in October 2006, but it simultaneously decided to grant transfer and issue an opinion in the case of Villas West II of Willowridge v. Edna McGlothin, No. 34S02-0805-CV-266. The case involved a covenant that the Indiana Court of Appeals described as being 'subterfuge for excluding minorities from renting homes' and a case of first impression that could affect how neighborhoods across the state implement no-rent provisions."
What makes this case even more interesting is the Indiana Supreme Court sent this back down to the trial court to determine if there was intentional discrimination.

Following up on "More Fall Out From the Nelms/Memory Gardens Case"

I noticed Cemetery trust money should go to a third party from The Grand Rapids (MI) Press and realized I had not followed up on More Fall Out From the Nelms/Memory Gardens Case. HB 1026 did become law is now effective according to the Indiana Bill Info site.

Sunday, May 18, 2008

Businesses and Contracts and a Follow up to "Looking Outside the Sandbox"

Rush on Business's Writing the Better Contract from Anita Campbell- Part II lead me to How To Earn Undying Loyalty From Business Clients (Part II) - Guest Blogger - Anita Campbell. I agree with Rush emphasizing the points about what makes a good contract:

  1. First and foremost, the better contract protects the client.
  2. The better contract is written in plain English. (A novel concept indeed!)
  3. The better contract is written for a 12th grade education or lower.
  4. The better contract incorporates standardization.
I came to law school in time for the Plain English movement. Oddly, I find clients who think if it is covered with legalese the contract must be defective. There is another point where the Bar is ahead of the clients and we need to educate our clients.

How To Earn Undying Loyalty From Business Clients (Part II) - Guest Blogger - Anita Campbell also has some points related to my Looking Outside the Sandbox:

Now, all of this standardization may sound counter to earning a living. But I suggest just the opposite -- if you make it as easy and painless as possible for clients to deal with you, they will be eternally loyal. They will so enjoy interacting with you, that they will find a recurring need for your services. And they will value your services more, because they know you value THEIR time -- and their budget.

Contrast that with the lawyer who insists that every contract or document must be written from scratch; who makes legal mountains out of molehills – and makes everything so complex that the small business owner cannot even delegate to staff, but has to get personally involved each time.

What happens to that lawyer? Clients get frustrated. They avoid coming to the lawyer even when they know they should. Why? They know the process will not be efficient. They fear their business goals will be delayed. They start making lawyer jokes. That’s when they start going bare, without legal counsel. Or worse, they start pulling out old agreements or downloading contracts from places like www.DocStoc.com and playing attorney without the benefit of proper advice.

I view lawyers who do not standardize their documents as being ignorant of computers. I began standardizing legal documents in 1994. This allows me to charge flat fees in many cases, if not most, and I do not know how I could operate nowadays without having computerized my practice.

Clients have a similar problem by not allowing their lawyers the opportunity to standardize the clients' documents. If clients give me a supply of work that can be standardized, I give the client a different fee rate than for one-off jobs. The only time I am using an hourly rate for document preparation is when I am faced with a job unique in content and a client from which I cannot expect repeat work. With any sort of volume, it is more practical for the lawyer to standardize the documents and which makes the work economical for both lawyer and client.

Saturday, May 17, 2008

NDA's

Start Up Lawyer Blog's What is important in a confidentiality agreement or non-disclosure agreement (NDA)? should be read by a business owner, employer or lawyer looking at a confidentiality agreement. Here are two examples.

Need for an agreement. Entering into an NDA increases the risk that the recipient may face charges of trade secret misappropriation if it develops similar information in the future or inadvertently discloses or uses the information. This is the primary reason that VCs will not enter into NDAs.

Mutual versus one-way. Some agreements only cover disclosure of confidential information by one party. Other agreements are mutual and cover disclosures by both parties. Generally speaking, mutual agreements are less likely to have provisions that are one-sided.
Be sure to read all of this post.

For those Indiana business wanting a NDA, feel to give me a call. I will also review NDA's for employees.

Interstate Trucking: New Regulations on Driver Qualifications

I know I am a day late on this but see the following post for why the posts here are a bit untimely. You can access the proposed regulations - with the deadline for making comments - at the following:

Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Renewals; Vision

Silence is not always golden

I am back from about 40 hours of misery. The doctor told me that it was some kind of allergic reaction. I told him I never used to have allergies. He say, these things happen when you get older. That got me thinking of atrophy and entropy - two subject that always get me depressed. I think the doctor has no idea why the room was spinning when it ought not have been but that has stopped. Everything has pretty much stopped except an aversion to food other than cottage cheese. No, we are not having fun in Anderson, but I hope that you are.

Friday, May 16, 2008

Online Resources: Open Source for Lawyers

Probably you have some idea of open source software, but whether you do or do not take a look at Open Source for Lawyers - Home. The site describes itself this way:

"If you are a lawyer or legal worker who is interested in implementing open source software in your practice, you have come to the right place."
Can we continue to compete as lawyers with the increased costs of software? I do not think so. I suggest taking a good look at this site, keep looking at it, and ask questions if you do not see the need or the cause of the fuss.

Looking Outside the Sandbox

Let me be frank that this post has little to do with law but a lot about lawyers, clients, how lawyers practice law and how I think clients perceive lawyers. After twenty years of practicing law in Indiana, having been computerized for the past 15 years, being connected to the Internet for the past 12 years and running this blog for the past year, I have some opinions and ideas.

First, I think that clients have certain misconceptions about lawyers. Most lawyers do not resemble the characters seen on television or in the movies. We follow our ethical rules and work for the best interests of our clients.

Second, I think that clients have misconceptions about how lawyers practice law. As a former partner once pointed out to me, we exist on the clients' post tax dollars. What does this mean? That too many clients buy on the sole criterion of price.

I say computers and then the Internet have disrupted the practice of law in ways many clients do not know and lots of attorneys do not like to admit. What I am writing about here applies not to us in Indiana but further afield in places like Scotland. The following comes from Dressed for Success published by Scotland's The Firm magazine:

“Our first purpose in creating Oracle was to achieve greater operational efficiency – by reducing overheads, for a start. This has been our greatest success. It was plain that previously we were all paying a lot for quite an extensive bureaucracy to answer phones, keep our diaries, issue invoices and collect fees for us. These are all straightforward functions and need not be expensive. We also believed that solicitors wanted to deal directly with Counsel. Rightly or wrongly, the existing arrangements were seen as cumbersome and inefficient for all involved.

“The stable system is really based on a world that has passed into history. Counsel cannot afford to be remote. Mobile phones, PDAs and e-mail have transformed our ability to communicate. Most solicitors now instruct us electronically. It is rare for us to deliver work in paper format. Electronic document control transforms turnaround times and makes diaries work for us, not the other way round. We believe our evolving business model to be both sustainable and efficient.”
We will not see more change until lawyers feel comfortable that they will not lose clients and income and clients must understand what they are getting from their lawyers.

With disruption does come opportunity and that is how I view JD Supra as a good reaction to the Internet.

Many years ago, I interviewed with a lawyer who had bought the local Indiana Bell building. Two lawyers and a secretary in a rather large building tastefully decorated for the purpose of impressing clients. He made a point of emphasizing the connection between putting on a good front that impressed clients and income. Over the years, I have come to agree with him even if I am annoyed at the idea that clients are so easily bamboozled. Being online has lead me to some strange encounters with potential clients - I am not sure if they think that being online means I am a charitable organization or not.

Take a look at Virtual Law Practice Blog. This blog complements the Kimbro Legal Services website. Which turns the idea of a large front on its head.

Business clients have the same problems. Bigger is not always better. Once upon a time there was a virtue to throwing bodies at a legal problem. Computers and the Internet changed all that. With a high-speed connection, I can get access to the news and case law just as quickly as a Big Firm without all the expense of those other bodies or the overhead of a large building for housign all those lawbooks. Take a look at Bigger Isn’t Always Better When It Comes to Outside Counsel from the ABA Section of Litigation. That article covers how business clients overlook smaller firms but also the marketing problems of lawyers.
Like James, Curley left a large firm to form his own office. He says that he and other solo and small firm practitioners have benefited from the increased use of technology. For example, many benefits that were traditionally available only at the larger firms “can be replicated through an artful use of technology in the hands of a competent solo. You don’t need the 100,000-volume law library that the big firms heavily invested in years ago. You don’t need the trappings of a class office space in a landmark building like people used to insist on years ago.” Also, with the availability of remote access, he says, clients have realized there is no need to pay for the overhead of a big firm.
What other ways are lawyers changing how they practice? Bay State Legal Services, LLC offers evening appointments. Note that they have a trademark on After-Hours Law. Which might be a little bit much but it does emphasize the seriousness of the firm. I know that many lawyers in this area offered the same kind of service for many years because of the client's have to work for a living. (One of my favorite comments about the Net is "what is old is new".)

Lawyers cannot meet clients' needs without knowing what clients think of the services they are getting from lawyers. Most clients have no idea what kind of service they are supposed to get from their lawyers. Clients have two metrics (if not only one): the lawyer's reputation for success and are the fees less than the competitors? Both are seriously flawed for judging legal services but especially looking for the lowest rate of fees. A potential client puzzled me when she asked me my hourly rate and then did not ask me to estimate the hours needed to complete the case. (I puzzled her by explaining my practice was largely flat fee). I suggest reading The State of the Legal Profession, Part 1 - Client Driven Innovation for a background on how businesses have been changing their relationships with law firms. This paragraph has given me a lot to think about:
In return, the outside firms are encouraged to advise Cisco on how to be a "better" client, in terms of communication, prioritization, and other matters aimed at increasing efficiencies related to the SLA. "Flexibility on both sides is required," Chandler said.
How do we advise our clients to be better clients? Lawyers, there is one great idea in there.

I think we need to educate our clients about what we do and how we do it. However, the clients need to help in this endeavor. I intended this blog as a way for me to expose the law and myself to the wider world. I am not sure but what I have failed in that endeavor and there are probably several good reasons for this failure. I will accept my shortcomings - a blog with a diffuse subject, posts too long, legalistic writing - if the potential clients will accept that they are looking for quick answers about something that does not provide quick answers. You, the non-lawyers, taking the time to read this must also start thinking outside of the sandbox.

Let me give an example of something related to my business practice, I have tried for years to promote a preventive law practice for my business clients without success. I do not understand why business owners are willing to pay a large fee to litigate case that might have been prevented with less in fees. If anyone cares to explain, I am quite eager to listen.

Which takes me back to The Firm's article:
At the time of the launch of Oracle Chambers Campbell and Carruthers were seen as mavericks, which in the often conservative legal profession is not always conducive to winning business. So, any regrets?

“Oracle Chambers was the best commercial idea we have ever had,” they say. “In just a year, we have seen our fee income grow significantly, and our administrative costs are now very, very low - it is the perfect economic equation. We think this is the future for Advocates, who above all must be fiercely independent, yet accessible. We are adaptable and responsive, easy to consult, and approachable. ”
I think both sides of the attorney/client relationship would benefit from changes in how we practice and with clients knowing more about what they are getting (or should get) from the profession.

New Business Blog and Some Comments on Business Partners

I think some will find RICHDAD interesting reading for business owners and investors even thought it is not a law blog. But as my long time readers know, I like to make mention of business blog that give practical advice and I think RICHDAD's Finding the Right Business Partner has some practical advice:

"Finding a great partner like Ken is similar to finding a great husband or wife -- you have to kiss a lot of frogs before you find the prince or princess of your dreams. I don't know of a magic formula other than to keep kissing."
Selecting a partner cautiously will save on legal fees. And like the post above, I am not using partner in its technical term but in the olloquail sense as having a business with another person or even two more. I do not know how to help potential business owners than with this advice.

Thursday, May 15, 2008

Online Resources: The IT Law Wiki

Need to know more about the law and information technology? The IT Law Wiki describes itself this way:

This wiki is an encyclopedia of the legal issues, cases, statutes, events, people, organizations and publications that make up the global field of information technology law (often referred to as “computer law”).
What business, what lawyer could not use such an introduction/guide to computer law?

Indiana Limited Liability Companies and Fiduciary Duties

Reading Chancery Gives Victory to "Freedom of Contract" and Refuses to "Find" Fiduciary Duties in LLC Agreement When Not Clearly Stated from Delaware Corporate and Commericial Litigation Blog gave me a reason to tout Indiana as a place for forming a limited liability company. The Delaware Chancery Court decided that Delaware law imposes no fidicuiary duty other than what is specifiied in the LLC's operating agreement.

Importantly, the court found no provision in the LLC Agreement at issue that: "create[d] a code of conduct for all members; on the contrary, most of those sections expressly claim to limit or waive liability."

Here is the money quote:

"There is no basis in the language of the LLC Agreement for Segal's contention that all members were bound by a code of conduct, but, even if there were, this Court could not enforce such a code because there is no limit whatsoever to its applicability".

The "implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing" claim was carefully examined and dispatched with one of the more lucid and cogent treatments I can recall of this amorphous cause of action.

Finally, the breach of fiduciary duty claim was confronted by first reciting the provisions of the Delaware LLC Act at Section 18-1101(c) that allow for complete elimination of all fiduciary duties as part of an LLC Agreement. The court read the parties' LLC Agreement in this case to eliminate fiduciary duties because it flatly stated that:

"...members have no duties other than those expressly articulated in the Agreement. Because the Agreement does not expressly articulate fiduciary obligations, they are eliminated."

Indiana's Court of Appeals decided in Purcell v. Southern Hills Investments, LLC (pdf format) that an implied fiduciary duty existed for Indiana LLC's. The Court of Appeals relied upon Credentials Plus LLC v. Calderone, 230 F. Supp.2d 890 (N.D. Ind. 2002) (see Purcell at page 9 -10).

The Delaware blog finds no problem with this situation while I have serious qualms. My qualms fall into two categories. First, having been involved in cases where the mistreatment of an LLC's minority members amounted to a breach of fiduciary duty and with an implied fiduciary duty there was no protection for the minority. Secondly, I see too many people relying on do-it-yourself sites to create their operating agreements and those can lead them into the first category.

All of which means one thing for the non-lawyer: get a lawyer to draft or review your LLC agreement.

Trademarks and Larry Bird

News from The Indiana Daily Lawyer about a new trademark case out of Indiana. Larry Bird sues over use of name and I am hard put to think of another name in this state and especially in French Lick which lead to this kind of lawsuit.

"Bird filed the suit, Larry Bird v. Legend of French Lick LLC, No. 4:08-CV-0070-DFH-WGH, in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, New Albany Division Monday against Georgianna Lincoln and Christopher Cooke, who purchased Bird's childhood home in French Lick from the Larry Joe Bird Revocable Living Trust.

The two marketed the property as a bed and breakfast, promoting the house as, 'Legend of French Lick, the Former Home of Larry Bird Resort.' The two also attempted to purchase memorabilia from Bird and wanted to use his name to identify the house; those requests were denied.

The lawsuit seeks to stop Lincoln and Cooke's unauthorized use of Bird's name in violation of federal trademark laws and state publicity laws. Bird has registered his name as a trademark with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, according to the suit. The suit also seeks damages for the improper use of his name and for the impoundment and turnover of certain properties the defendants used improperly."
I wish I had a bit more time to dig into this one. I am a bit surprised that the seller did not impose some limitations on the buyers that might have prevented this suit. Does it seem like such a stretch of the imagination to think the buyer of Larry Bird's childhood home would not try to use the home to make money based on that association? Or that the seller would react in this way? I think not.

10/19/2008: Update - the lawsuit settled.

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

Indiana Law on Breach of Fiduciary Duty

First, what is a fiduciary duty? Where one is in a position of trust to others then that person has a fiduciary duty to those others.

Second, when can one sue for a breach of fiduciary duty? When the person having the trust commits an act clearly in his own interest and against the interest of the corporation, a breach of fiduciary duty occurs.

More specifically, the law sets out three elements the plaintiff must prove for a successful breach of fiduciary duty case: (1) the defendant had a fiduciary duty to the plaintiff, (2) the defendant breached the duty, and (3) the breach of duty caused injury to the plaintiff.

See Hartung v. Architects Hartung/Odle/Burke, Inc., 157 Ind. App. 546, 552, 301 N.E.2d 240, 242 (1973). For a more accessible case involving the fiduciary duty of a shareholder and relying on Hartung, see Linden v. Coco (html format).

Tuesday, May 13, 2008

A New Idea to Aid in Caring for Aged Parents

I keep saying that everyone needs to think about advanced directives: a power of attorney, healthcare power of attorney, and a Living Will. I am now intrigued by an idea I found via You and Yours Blog's Family Contracts to Make Siblings Get Along for the Care of Aging Parents in the Dallas Morning News Caring for pops: Put it in writing:

"To manage that familial strife, Mr. Hofheinz has come up with what he calls a 'memorandum of understanding' between siblings. The contract spells out each adult child's responsibilities and holds that person accountable for them."
It is a good idea and one worth contemplating.

Sunday, May 11, 2008

Online Resources: Estate Planning and Elder Law

Credit Wake Forest Law School's Elder Law Clinic with a compact collection of links to books, articles, and newsletters relating to estate planning and elder law.

No, it is not legal advice but legal information. Like this blog, it is a place to start your legal research and not its end.

Happy Mother's Day

I wish all of you a Happy Mother's Day.

Saturday, May 10, 2008

LLC Uniform laws

Not too often do I write about theory rather than practice, but reading A model for LLC laws (Thanks to Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog for its Ribstein on LLCs that lead me to Professor Ribstein's article).

I do not know that our General Assembly has given any thought to revising our LLC statute. If there is any movement in Indiana towards changing the LLC statute, I say reading Professor's Ribstein's article should come first.

Friday, May 9, 2008

Funeral Home News: What is the FTC doing in Pittsburgh?

WTAE from Pittsburgh reports that the FTC followed up the television's investigation into the area's funeral homes compliance with the FTC Funeral Home Rule. Now the strangeness apparently starts:

But the FTC refuses to tell consumers exactly what the funeral homes did that was wrong.

***

But the FTC refused to make public the nature of the violations at Cooke Funeral Home. Details of the violations are whited out from the documents that Team 4 requested.


All this sounds very ominous until one gets down towards the end of the story:
The FTC took no action against Lanigan, but it did require the other four to enter the Funeral Rule Offenders Program, a three-year educational program operated not by the government but by the funeral home industry itself.

And that's the trade-off for offenders. They agree to enter the FROP program, and the public will never find out what they did wrong.

I have yet to deal with the FROP program - and hope never to do so. See, I agree with one of the other Pittsburgh funeral directors:
East Pittsburgh Funeral Director Pat Lanigan was also visited by undercover FTC agents, who later sent him a compliance letter claiming his business committed "very serious violations of the (funeral) rule." But the details of those violations were erased from the copy of the letter the FTC sent to Team 4.

"In my case, somebody could make up any story in any figment from their imagination about what I did wrong, and we didn't do anything wrong," said Lanigan. "Actually, it was just a misinterpretation by the FTC of our price list."
I think combining a higholy publicized story with a the anonymity of FROP creates a nasty situation implied by Mr. Lanigan.

Luckily, Indiana funeral directors have not had a sweep like this one in Pittsburgh. That does not mean we can assume none loom in the future. Do a good audit of your procedures and make sure that your people get trained thoroughly in the Funeral Home Rule.

Indiana Business News: State Funds for ESOPs

The Indianapolis Star reports on a new sate program which should encourage employee stock ownership programs here.

Indiana State Treasurer Richard Mourdock on Tuesday announced a $50 million program to help workers set up employee stock ownership programs.

***

Under the state plan, workers can get loans from participating banks to set up ESOPs. The state doesn't guarantee the loans, but encourages banks to participate by buying certificates of deposit at reduced interest rates. In turn, the banks provide loans at reduced rates to Indiana businesses that are setting up ESOP programs.

The initial rates that financial institutions will be charging Indiana businesses through the program will be 4.25 percent.


Thursday, May 8, 2008

Employment Law: Federal FMLA Jury Instructions

The Indiana Daily Lawyer reports that the 7th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions Committee is accepting public comments on jury instructions for Family Medical Leave Act cases. The IDL had the following contact information:

Comments should be e-mailed to U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana Chief Judge Robert L. Miller Jr. at Robert_Miller@innd.uscourts.gov with a subject line of "Pattern FMLA Instruction Comment" or mailed to the judge at U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, 204 S. Main St., South Bend, IN 46601. Comments will be accepted through June 30.

A copy of the FMLA draft for notice and comment is available on the Northern District's Web site.

Wednesday, May 7, 2008

Online Resource: Startup Company Lawyer

Startup Company Lawyer is a lawyer's blog out of California. Here is a description of the writer and the blog:

Yoichiro (”Yokum”) Taku is a corporate and securities partner in the Palo Alto, California office of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. My WSGR web bio is here.

WSGR represents:
• more than 20% of the companies receiving venture financing each year;
• more U.S. companies in their initial public offerings than any other law firm worldwide; and
• more technology companies in mergers and acquisitions than any other U.S. law firm.

I represent technology and growth companies at all stages of development, through private financings, strategic transactions, public offerings, and mergers and acquisitions. I also represent investors in venture capital financings. I also advise numerous entrepreneurs from initial company formation to liquidity event. At any time, I typically represent several startup companies seeking venture financing, private companies that have received financing, and publicly traded companies.

My reading of the blog impressed me with the writing about financing - which is not a subject I tend to write about here. It is my opinion that financing a new business is the biggest obstacle between a good business idea and a business.

Tuesday, May 6, 2008

Starting a Business - Is the Idea a Good Business

4 Entrepeneur hits hard with Is Your Great Idea A Real Business?:

The first question you should ask: Do you have a compelling value proposition? This point is forever worth repeating: Great ideas are only great business ideas if you can convince people to pay for your product or service at a price above what it costs you to deliver it. Just because you think the world needs new canine cologne doesn’t mean anyone else agrees–or if they do, that they would be willing to pay enough to cover your electric bill.

You don’t need a 90-page business plan to convey a value proposition. In fact, you should be able to communicate it in a few sentences. If you can’t figure out why your product is great, your customers probably can’t, either.
I notice it has been a while since I posted a business oriented article but for those wanting to start a business need to take a look at this.

Employment Law for Businesses: FirstStep Recordkeeping, Reporting and Notices elaws

The federal Department of Labor put a big effort into publiczing its FirstStep Recordkeeping, Reporting and Notices elaws.

First, a press release (U.S. Department of Labor releases new “elaws” tool to help employers comply with recordkeeping, reporting and notice requirements) with the following:

The new FirstStep Recordkeeping, Reporting and Notices elaws Advisor has been integrated into a FirstStep suite of advisors that also includes the revised and expanded FirstStep Poster Advisor and FirstStep Employment Law Overview Advisor.

"These Internet tools will make it easier for small business employers to learn about and comply with the federal laws that apply to them," said Secretary of Labor Elaine L. Chao.

The elaws advisors are free, Web-based tools designed to help employers and workers understand the department's major employment laws. By asking a series of questions, the advisors simulate a conversation with a Department of Labor expert and guide users to customized information explaining the requirements of each law.

Then, the FirstStep Employment Law Advisor which has three parts:

This Advisor provides three basic starting points depending on your interests and needs:

The federal DOL also has the Compliance Assistance - News Room.

Monday, May 5, 2008

Indiana jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants

How do Indiana courts have jurisdiction over people and businesses not residing Indiana courts? After all, Indiana's civil jurisdiction ends at its borders.

Indiana's Trial Rule sets out how to get jurisdiction. Indiana Trial Rule 4.4 (Service upon persons in actions for acts done in this state or having an effect in this state) sets out the categories of actions by defendants which give Indiana court's jurisdiction over those defendants.
What neither the courts nor out-of-state businesses wants is to be brought into an Indiana court for an inadvertent incursion to Indiana. The law gives weight to the amount of contact an out-of-state defendant has with Indiana. Where defendant's the only contacts are by telephone
and without personal appearance in Indiana and it is the Indiana plaintiff initiating contact, Indiana law makes it very difficult to have jurisdiction over the out-of-state defendant. See Dura-Line Corp. v. Sloan, 487 N.E2d 469 (Ind. Ct App. 1986) and Baseball Card World, Inc. v. Pannette, 583 N.E.2d 753 (Ind. Ct App. 1991), trans. denied..

Indiana businesses need to be careful about dealing with out-of-state persons. Consulting with a lawyer about the problems of operating outside of Indiana is far cheaper than trying to collect a debt in another state.

Indiana Business Opportunity Transactions Act

For those buying or leasing goods from another to start a business, take a look at Indiana's Business Opportunity Transactions Act. The statute came to my attention when I found online a complaint filed by Indiana's Attorney General. The complaint is to be found here.

I have taken the liberty of quoting the most pertinent parts of the definition for "Business opportunity":

(1) involves the sale or lease or offer to sell or lease any goods or services to an investor that are to be used by the investor in beginning or operating a business;
(2) involves an initial payment by the investor of more than five hundred dollars ($500) and an initial cash payment of less than fifty thousand dollars ($50,000); and
(3) involves a solicitation of investors in which the seller represents that:
(A) the investor may or will earn an amount in excess of the initial payment as a result of the investment;
(B) a market exists for any goods to be made or services to be rendered by the investor;
(C) the seller may buy from the investor any goods to be made or services to be rendered by the investor;
(D) the seller or a person referred by the seller to the investor may or will sell, lease, or distribute the goods made or services rendered by the investor; or
(E) the seller may or will pay to the investor the difference between the initial payment and the investor's earnings from the investment.
Businesses can face felony charges, a civil suit, an action by the Attorney General or all of the above.

Online Resources for Law

Not endorsing - just informing.

Global Legal Iinformation Network:

The Global Legal Information Network (GLIN) is a public database of official texts of laws, regulations, judicial decisions, and other complementary legal sources contributed by governmental agencies and international organizations. These GLIN members contribute the full texts of their published documents to the database in their original languages. Each document is accompanied by a summary in English and, in many cases in additional languages, plus subject terms selected from the multilingual index to GLIN. All summaries are available to the public, and public access to full texts is also available for most jurisdictions.

The Public Library of Law:
Searching the Web is easy. Why should searching the law be any different? That's why Fastcase has created the Public Library of Law -- to make it easy to find the law online. PLoL is the largest free law library in the world, because we assemble law available for free scattered across many different sites -- all in one place. PLoL is the best starting place to find law on the Web.

Starting a Business? Why You Need a Lawyer!

I have written before about why having a lawyer from the beginning is a good thing for a business. Now Michigan Business Law Blog has done a very good job of putting all the reasons into a list of eight. Everything in Why You Should Contact a Lawyer Before Organizing Your New Business applies to Indiana businesses.

If you do not have an attorney and are wanting to start a business in Indiana, please feel free to contact me.

Forms, JD Supra, and What Do You Think?

Consider this post as an open invitation for comments. I encourage anyone to let the world (well, the very small slice of the world reading this blog) know what they think about posting forms to Net and JD Supra.

JD Supra is a recent and probably important Internet legal resource. That The New York Times published Lawyers Open Their File Cabinets for a Web Resource might show the site has drawn some important attention except that The Times filed the article under "Novelties".

The Times described the site like this:

It works like this: Lawyers who contribute to JD Supra dip into their hard drives for articles, court papers, legal briefs and other tidbits of their craft. They upload the documents, as well as a profile of themselves that is linked to each document. Site visitors who have a legal problem and are thinking about finding a lawyer can use an easily searchable database to look up, say, “trademark infringement,” find related documents and, if they like the author’s experience and approach, perhaps click on his or her profile.

Okay, that is the idea. Not probably as attractive to the DIY crowd as it will be to lawyers, but let me go on to Vancouver Law Librarian Blog's NY Times Covers Consumer Benefits of JD Supra.

Vancouver Law Librarian Blog puts forward a much more interesting question than did The New York Times (which is probably because The Times was not writing as a lawyer for lawyers to read):
Looking purely from a consumer's view, I see the benefits of sharing work product as:
  • The ability to read these documents & become better informed;
  • Increased reliability of documents where Lawyers take public ownership of them;
  • Researching legal issues within a collection of vetted documents;
  • Ability to identify a lawyer with rare experience (& not worth the lawyer's effort to market);
  • Ability to identify expertise by geographic region or practice area;
When decisions & execution are *this* important, I can't see DIY legal work being an issue. The question then becomes, are Consumers better off with these documents available?


The bullet points make sense and I cannot disagree with them. I can see how we might better explain the law by exposing the public to our work product. That is, show the how the abstraction of a statute (or whatever source of law) becomes reality in the shape of a pleading.

I have made my opinions about doing your own legal work more explicit on my Indiana Divorce & Family Law Blog (which you can see here) than I have on this blog. Before running across JD Supra, I was always troubled by the fact that forms need to be put into the correct legal context. No one uses a hammer where a scalpel is the proper tool but I see that possibility whenever one does their own legal work. I think JD Supra might address that problem.

So anyone want to sound off one way or another?

Sunday, May 4, 2008

The Indiana Funeral Home and Cemetary Law Wiki

While not yet ready for public display, I decided about six weeks ago to work on a special project involving Indiana's law on funeral homes, cemeteries, and related subjects.

Why a wiki? Because unlike this blog, a wiki is meant for collaboration. Binary Law's Blogs vs wikis for an explanation of the uses of a wiki versus a blog. For more of an explanation what is a wiki there is Video: Wikis in Plain English or this Wikipedia entry.

Being meant for collaboration requires collaborators. I invite any Indiana lawyers representing funeral directors or funeral homes or cemeteries to send me an e-mail - if they want more information. For those wanting to a very rough draft of a work in progress, click here.

Any further writing by me about the law of funeral homes, cemeteries, and related subjects will take place there and not here. This is also the start of my reshaping this blog to fit a bit better my current practice and provide a bit more of a focus to the blog itself.

Who Controls Indiana Cemetery Plots?

Let us assume one person wants to buy a headstone for another person's grave site, can they do so? This question depends on the ownership of the burial plot.

Indiana statutes define the ownership rights to multi-space plots. joint multi-space plots, and family burial plots. Only the first type of plot presents the prospect of a single owner of the plot. So long as another person has a property interest in the burial plot, I cannot see any way of putting a headstone on the grave site without the co-owner's permission. That is simple property law.

The Legal Antiquarian Blog

Probably more for lawyers who have a bent for history than for those of you who find themselves here, but since I am a lawyer with a bent for history I like what I see (so far) at The Legal Antiquarian.

Professor Hoeflich describes the blog's purpose as:

...devoted to the history of the material culture of the law, i.e. to the various aspects of legal history having to do with the daily life of lawyers and judges, as well as to the sources, manuscript, printed, and otherwise preserved which can be used to help understand how law and the legal profession functioned in the past

Saturday, May 3, 2008

Online Resources: Justia Regulation Tracker

Need to keep up with or find federal regulations? Check out Justia's Regulation Tracker. It is still in beta and that means it is not quite a final product - yet. I find it useful and hope you do also.

Online Resources: The Federal Rules of Evidence

I probably ought to just post a link to Cornell's Legal Information Institute as being the online legal resource. I have been visiting this site for over ten years now and there is a wealth of information. Today, I will just highlight the Federal Rules of Evidence (2007). What makes this - to me - a better than average resource is the site also publishes the Notes for the Rules. For example, the Notes for FRE 101 are here.

Friday, May 2, 2008

Do Corporate Governance Procedures Apply to Indiana Limited Liability Companies?

Not a question that has come up in Indiana but has in Delaware. See LLC Not Subject to Corporate Governance Standards of Corporations.

From the description of Delaware law given in this post, I do not think there is any great difference with Indiana law. Which is why I when I have written here about limited liability companies I have emphasized the importance of the operating agreement.

If you are trying to start a LLC in Indiana, I am taking on new clients at this time.

Thursday, May 1, 2008

Indiana Law on Judicially Dissolving a Limited Liability Company

Indiana has no case law on dissolving a limited liability company. The statute setting the procedure for judicially dissolving a LLC is IC 23-18-9-2:

On application by or for a member, the circuit or superior court of the county in which the limited liability company's principal office, or if there is none in Indiana, in which the registered office is located, may decree dissolution of the limited liability company whenever it is not reasonably practicable to carry on the business in conformity with the articles of organization or operating agreement.
Which made Judicial Dissolution of the Unprofitable LLC from New York Business Divorce Blog very interesting. New York's statute parallels Indiana's 23-18-9-2 without any significant differences and there is case law interpreting the statute.

Thinking over the argument regarding profitability as grounds for dissolution, I can see why the New York judges considered lack of profitability as grounds for dissolution but I think the argument against this position is the better one. I cannot think of any judges I am acquainted with having any experience in business. I can see them thinking that an unprofitable business equates to a failure of the operating agreement.

I see here a reference for us in Indiana for litigation purposes and a bit more. I read the following as something for us to think of when drafting a LLC operating agreement:
Profitability or the lack thereof, by itself, clearly is no basis to grant or deny dissolution, assuming the operating agreement itself does not set forth some measure of financial distress as ground for dissolution.

So What Is Contract Law?

At forty-eight, I doubt I have time to answer that question. Here is a far less facetious answer: it is the law of private agreements. I can more easily say that contracts are more than the paper that most people think are contracts. Those documents saying contracts exist more as evidence of the agreement.

What I can do is suggest reading this outline of contract law (thanks to Deal Lawyer Blog for this). Reading this might show my facetious answer was not so facetious after all.

If you are located in Indiana looking for an attorney to draft a contract or need similar business law services, I am taking on new clients. I am also taking on contract litigation in Indiana.